Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ºñ°­³» Åõ¿©µÈ MidazolamÀÇ ¿ë·®¿¡ µû¸¥ ÁøÁ¤È¿°úÀÇ ºñ±³¿¬±¸

THE COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE EFFICACY OF INTRANASAL MIDAZOLAM OF TWO DIFFERENT DOSES IN SEDATING YOUNG PEDIATRIC DENTAL PATIENTS

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 1996³â 23±Ç 1È£ p.65 ~ 87
±è¿µ±¤, ÃÖ¿ëö,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±è¿µ±¤ (  ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­³»°úÇÐ
ÃÖ¿ëö (  ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

°á·Ð
ÀúÀÚ´Â Ä¡°úÄ¡·á½Ã ´Ù·ç±â Èûµç 24-52°³¿ù(Æò±Õ 36.6°³¿ù)ÀÇ ½Åü °Ç°­ÇÑ 25¸íÀǼҾÆȯÀÚ
¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î 0.2§·/§¸°ú 03.§·/§¸ÀÇ midazolamÀ» ÀÌÁ߸ͰËÀÇ ¹æ½ÄÀ¸·Î ºñ°­³»·Î Åõ¿©ÇÑÈÄ
±×È¿°ú¸¦ ÀÓ»óÀûÀ¸·Î Æò°¡ÇÑ °á°ú ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. ÁøÁ¤È¿°úÀÇ Æò°¡¿¡ »ç¿ëµÈ rationg scoreÀÇ ºñ±³ °á°ú 0.2§·/§¸ ±ºÀÌ 0.3§·/§¸ ±ºº¸´Ù
´Ù¼Ò ³ôÀº ¼öÄ¡¸¦ º¸¿´À¸³ª, wilcoxon Matched Signed Rank Test¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© Åë°èó¸®ÇÑ
°á°ú Alerthness, Crying, MovementÀÇ Á¤µµ´Â 7´Ü°è ¸ðµÎ¿¡¼­ Åë°èÇÐÀûÀÎ À¯ÀÇÂ÷°¡ ³ªÅ¸³ª
Áö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù(p>.05)
2. General behavior´Â 0.2§·/§¸¸¦ Åõ¿©ÇÑ ±º¿¡¼­ ´Ù¼Ò ³ôÀº °á°ú¸¦ º¸¿´À¸³ª(0.2§·/§¸ :
4.4.8¡¾1.58, 0.3 : 4.40¡¾1.38) Åë°èÇÐÀû À¯ÀÇÂ÷´Â Á¸ÀçÇÏÁö ¾Ê¾Ò°í(p>.05), °¢ ±ºÀÇ ÀÓ»óÀû ¼º
°ø·üÀº 0.2§·/§¸ ±ºÀÌ 80%, 0.3§·/§¸±ºÀÌ 72%·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
3. ȸº¹Áö¿¬, û»öÁõ, È£Èí¾ïÁ¦ µî°ú °°Àº ºÎÀÛ¿ëÀº ³ªÅ¸³ªÁö ¾Ê¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, ´ëü·Î ¾ÈÁ¤µÈ µ¿
¸ÆÇ÷ »ê¼ÒÆ÷È­µµ°¡ °üÂûµÇ¾î µÎ ¿ë·® ¸ðµÎ ÀÓ»óÀûÀ¸·Î ¾ÈÁ¤µÈ »ý¸®ÇÐÀû »óŸ¦ º¸¿´´Ù.
4. º» Àӻ󿬱¸ÀÇ °á°ú·Î ¹Ì·ç¾î midazalmÀÇ ºñ°­³» Åõ¿©´Â ¼Ò¾ÆȯÀÚÀÇ ÇൿÁ¶ÀýÀ» À§ÇÑ
È¿°úÀûÀÎ ÁøÁ¤¿ä¹ýÀ¸·Î¼­ÀÇ °¡´É¼ºÀÌ ÃæºÐÈ÷ ÀÎÁ¤µÇ¸ç, 0.2§·/§¸ÀÇ ¿ë·®ÀÇ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°ú ȯÀÚ¸¦
´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÑ ÁøÁ¤¿ä¹ýÀÇ ÀûÀýÇÑ ¿ë·®À¸·Î ¿©°ÜÁö³ª, º¸´Ù ¸¹Àº ȯÀÚ¿Í ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¹üÀ§ÀÇ ¿ë·®
À» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÑ ¿¬±¸°¡ °è¼ÓµÇ¾îÁ®¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The purpose of this study was to assess the sedative effect and physiological
parameter of two doses of intranasal midazolam in sedating young children for dental
treatment. Twenty-five uncooperative children, mean age of 36.6 months, who needed at
least two separate restorative visits, requiring local anesthesia participated in this study.
The patients randomly received either 0.2§·/§¸ or 0.3§·/§¸ of midazolam intranasally,
with the alternate regimen administered at the second appointment. All the children were
restrained in a Papoose board and were monitored with Pulse oximeter for their heart
rate and oxygen saturation. Degree of alertness, crying, and movement were evaluated
at the start of treatment and the subsequent seven intervals throughout the procedure.
Evaluation of overall behavior at each session was performed by one investigator, blind
to the dose, using a separate rating scale. The reliability of ratings was assessed by
two investigators using videotapes of the procedures. Statistical analysis showed no
significantly different behavior (p>.05) between children receiving the two different
doses. Successful sedation, as assessed by lack of or minimal crying and/or movement
that interrupted treatment, was observed in most of the treatment visits with both doses
(mean score 4.48¡¾1.58 for 0.2§·/§¸ and 4.40¡¾1.38 for 0.3§·/§¸). No adverse effect was
observed, and most of treatments were successfully completed without difficulties.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI